State ex rel. McGhee v. Ohio Utilities Co.

100 Ohio St. (N.S.) 538
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 7, 1919
DocketNos. 16185, 16186 and 16187
StatusPublished

This text of 100 Ohio St. (N.S.) 538 (State ex rel. McGhee v. Ohio Utilities Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. McGhee v. Ohio Utilities Co., 100 Ohio St. (N.S.) 538 (Ohio 1919).

Opinion

The defendants, by leave of court first had, hereby withdraw their answers, thereupon the court coming on to adjudicate this cause as set forth in said petitions finds that the defendants are in default for demurrer or answer to said petitions, and that said defendants thereby confess the allegations of said petitions to be true.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the state is the legal owner of, and that F. A. Stacey, the lessee of the state, is entitled to the possession of the land described in the petitions [539]*539herein. And it further appearing from the professional statement of counsel that the defendants have by contract and lease with said F. A. Stacey acquired the right and privilege of the occupancy of certain parts of the said canal land now and heretofore occupied by said defendants, that it is not now necessary that an order issue herein as against said defendants.

Judgment for possession of property awarded State of Ohio.

Nichols, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker and Robinson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 Ohio St. (N.S.) 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-mcghee-v-ohio-utilities-co-ohio-1919.