State Ex Rel. McFadden v. State Board of Canvassers

Supreme Court of South Carolina

State Ex Rel. McFadden v. State Board of Canvassers

67 S.E. 1072, 86 S.C. 55, 1910 S.C. LEXIS 14

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedMay 11, 1910

Docket7573

StatusPublished

This text of 67 S.E. 1072 (State Ex Rel. McFadden v. State Board of Canvassers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. McFadden v. State Board of Canvassers, 67 S.E. 1072, 86 S.C. 55, 1910 S.C. LEXIS 14 (S.C. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

This was a petition to this Court, in its original jurisdiction, for a writ of certiorari to the State Board of Canvassers to review their action in dismissing an appeal from the county board of canvassers for Clarendon County, which overruled the contest of the petitioners of an election held in a portion of Clarendon County on the proposition to form a new county out of portions of Clarendon and Williamsburg Counties. There was only one precinct and voting place in that portion of Clarendon County involved in the new county proposition. The validity of the election at that precinct was contested on numerous grounds. There was no question as to the election in that portion of Williamsburg County sought to be incorporated into the proposed new county, and it was admitted that the new county proposition failed to secure the necessary two-thirds vote in that section. The Constitution (Art. VII, sec. 2), as to the formation of new counties, provides that “no section of the county proposed to be dis *56 membered shall be thus cut off without consent by a two-thirds vote of those voting in such election.”

As the new county could not be created without securing a two-thirds vote in favor of it in that portion of Williams-burg which it was proposed to cut off, and as the proposition failed to secure such vote, the validity of the election held in Clarendon becomes immaterial.

The petition is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

This was a petition to this Court, in its original jurisdiction, for a writ of certiorari to the State Board of Canvassers to review their action in dismissing an appeal from the county board of canvassers for Clarendon County, which overruled the contest of the petitioners of an election held in a portion of Clarendon County on the proposition to form a new county out of portions of Clarendon and Williamsburg Counties. There was only one precinct and voting place in that portion of Clarendon County involved in the new county proposition. The validity of the election at that precinct was contested on numerous grounds. There was no question as to the election in that portion of Williamsburg County sought to be incorporated into the proposed new county, and it was admitted that the new county proposition failed to secure the necessary two-thirds vote in that section. The Constitution (Art. VII, sec. 2), as to the formation of new counties, provides that “no section of the county proposed to be dis *56 membered shall be thus cut off without consent by a two-thirds vote of those voting in such election.”

As the new county could not be created without securing a two-thirds vote in favor of it in that portion of Williams-burg which it was proposed to cut off, and as the proposition failed to secure such vote, the validity of the election held in Clarendon becomes immaterial.

The petition is therefore dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 S.E. 1072, 86 S.C. 55, 1910 S.C. LEXIS 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-mcfadden-v-state-board-of-canvassers-sc-1910.