State ex rel. McCuller v. Calabrese
This text of 2013 Ohio 590 (State ex rel. McCuller v. Calabrese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel. McCuller v. Calabrese, 2013-Ohio-590.]
Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98828
STATE OF OHIO EX REL, CHARLES D. McCULLER RELATOR
vs.
JUDGE DEENA R. CALABRESE RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED
Writ of Procedendo Motion No. 458559 Order No. 462221
RELEASED DATE: February 15, 2013 -i- FOR RELATOR
Charles D. McCuller, Pro Se Inmate #482-821 Grafton Correctional Inst. 2500 S. Avon Beldon Road Grafton, Ohio 44044
FOR RESPONDENTS
Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor
By: James E. Moss Assistant county Prosecutor 9th Floor, Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, J.:
{¶1} Charles D. McCuller, the relator, has filed a complaint for a writ of
procedendo. McCuller seeks an order from this court which requires Judge Deena R.
Calabrese, the respondent, to render rulings with regard to three “motion[s] to vacate void
sentence” that are pending in State v. McCuller, Cuyahoga C.P. Case Nos. CR-79-48254,
CR-79-48919, and CR-79-52011. McCuller’s request for a writ of procedendo is moot.
{¶2} Attached to Judge Calabrese’s motion for summary judgment are three
judgment entries, each journalized on September 11, 2012, that demonstrate rulings have
been rendered with regard to each pending motion to vacate void sentence. Thus, Judge
Calabrese has proceeded to judgment and McCuller’s request for a writ of procedendo is
moot. State ex rel. Fontanella v. Kantos, 117 Ohio St.3d 514, 2008-Ohio-1431, 885
N.E.2d 220; State ex rel. Howard v. Doneghy, 102 Ohio St.3d 355, 2004-Ohio-3207, 810
N.E.2d 958, ¶ 6, quoting State ex rel. Kreps v. Christiansen (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 313,
318, 725 N.E.2d 663.
{¶3} Accordingly, we grant Judge Calabrese’s motion for summary judgment.
McCuller to pay costs. Cost ordered waived. The court directs the clerk of court to serve
all parties with notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal as required by
Civ.R. 58(B). {¶4} Writ denied.
PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, PRESIDING JUDGE
MELODY J. STEWART, A.J., and EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 Ohio 590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-mcculler-v-calabrese-ohioctapp-2013.