State Ex Rel. McClintock v. Diehl

154 N.E. 726, 115 Ohio St. 454, 115 Ohio St. (N.S.) 454, 1926 Ohio LEXIS 227
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 16, 1926·No. 20191·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

By the Court.

This is an original action in this court, praying a writ of prohibition against the common pleas court of Stark county, to prevent that court from admitting one Rudner to bail, said Rudner being indicted on a charge of first degree *455 murder. The clerk of the court is also made a party defendant. Both the judge and the clerk have demurred to the petition, and the petition and demurrer challenge the jurisdiction of the trial court, before trial, to hear and determine the right of a person under indictment to be admitted to bail. Upon the authority of Kendle v. Tarbell, 24 Ohio St., 196, the demurrer must be overruled, and the jurisdiction of the court must be denied.

Demurrer overruled.

Marshall, C. J., Day, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur. Robinson, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. McClintock v. Diehl, 154 N.E. 726, 115 Ohio St. 454, 115 Ohio St. (N.S.) 454, 1926 Ohio LEXIS 227 (Ohio 1926).

154 N.E. 726 (State Ex Rel. McClintock v. Diehl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Reams v. Stuart
188 N.E. 393 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1933)