State ex rel. McClendon v. Ragland

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. McClendon v. Ragland

532 So. 2d 167, 1988 La. LEXIS 2313, 1988 WL 114981

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 28, 1988

DocketNo. 88-KH-2564

StatusPublished

This text of 532 So. 2d 167 (State ex rel. McClendon v. Ragland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. McClendon v. Ragland, 532 So. 2d 167, 1988 La. LEXIS 2313, 1988 WL 114981 (La. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In re McClendon, Oscar; —Plaintiffs); applying for writ of mandamus and supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Madison, 6th Judicial District Court, Div. “B.”

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for post conviction relief. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re McClendon, Oscar; —Plaintiffs); applying for writ of mandamus and supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Madison, 6th Judicial District Court, Div. “B.”

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for post conviction relief. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

532 So. 2d 167, 1988 La. LEXIS 2313, 1988 WL 114981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-mcclendon-v-ragland-la-1988.