State ex rel. McCann v. Enos
This text of 72 N.W. 222 (State ex rel. McCann v. Enos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The question is simply one of construction of a statute, and there is little that can be profitably said by way of argument. The provision is not as plain in its meaning as might be wished, yet the difficulty in construction does not seem great. The purpose of the act' from beginning to end was to secure uniformity in city government-This is an important, and almost a controlling, consideration. With this consideration in mind, it seems quite clear to us that the statute means that, when an existing city adopts the act, its school system shall remain as before, if it have a school board elected by the people or be operating under the district system, until changed by vote of the people, but that in all other cases (this includes a village which-organizes as a city) the board of education shall consist of one commissioner from each ward, and three from the city at large,, to be appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the council.
The village of Waukesha falls within the latter class, and hence it is the mayor’s duty to appoint a board of education,, and the judgment of the circuit court was correct.
By the Gourt.— Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 N.W. 222, 97 Wis. 164, 1897 Wisc. LEXIS 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-mccann-v-enos-wis-1897.