State ex rel. McCaffrey v. Mahoning Cty. Prosecutor's Office

946 N.E.2d 761, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1491

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. McCaffrey v. Mahoning Cty. Prosecutor's Office. Read the opinion of the Court — 128 Ohio St. 3d 1451 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 10, 2011·No. 2010-1642·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus.

Upon consideration of respondents’ motion to suppress the deposition of Clerical Assistant Diane Stokes, it is ordered that the motion is granted.

Upon consideration of relator’s motion to compel the court reporter and videographer to produce to relator the transcript and DVD of the April 7, 2011 deposition of Diane Stokes, it is ordered that the motion is denied.

[1492]*1492Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., dissent and would defer ruling on the motions and order the deposition to be filed under seal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus.

Upon consideration of respondents’ motion to suppress the deposition of Clerical Assistant Diane Stokes, it is ordered that the motion is granted.

[1492]*1492Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., dissent and would defer ruling on the motions and order the deposition to be filed under seal.

State ex rel. McCaffrey v. Mahoning Cty. Prosecutor's Office, 946 N.E.2d 761, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1491 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

946 N.E.2d 761 (State ex rel. McCaffrey v. Mahoning Cty. Prosecutor's Office) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.