State ex rel. McAdoo v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. McAdoo v. Indus. Comm.

1998 Ohio 105, 83 Ohio St. 3d 331

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 7, 1998

Docket1996-1654

StatusPublished

This text of 1998 Ohio 105 (State ex rel. McAdoo v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. McAdoo v. Indus. Comm., 1998 Ohio 105, 83 Ohio St. 3d 331 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 331.]

THE STATE EX REL. MCADOO, CROSS-APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, CROSS-APPELLEE.

[Cite as State ex rel. McAdoo v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-105.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of Newman. (No. 96-1654—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided October 7, 1998.) CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD05- 615. __________________ Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jaffy and Marc J. Jaffy; Deegan & McGarry and F. Timothy Deegan, for cross-appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Michael A. Vanderhorst, Assistant Attorney General, for cross-appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on authority of State ex rel. Newman v. Indus. Comm. (1997), 77 Ohio St.3d 271, 673 N.E.2d 1301. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 331.]

THE STATE EX REL. MCADOO, CROSS-APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, CROSS-APPELLEE.

[Cite as State ex rel. McAdoo v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-105.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of Newman. (No. 96-1654—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided October 7, 1998.) CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD05- 615. __________________ Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jaffy and Marc J. Jaffy; Deegan & McGarry and F. Timothy Deegan, for cross-appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Michael A. Vanderhorst, Assistant Attorney General, for cross-appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on authority of State ex rel. Newman v. Indus. Comm. (1997), 77 Ohio St.3d 271, 673 N.E.2d 1301. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1998 Ohio 105, 83 Ohio St. 3d 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-mcadoo-v-indus-comm-ohio-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack