State ex rel. McAdoo v. Indus. Comm.

1998 Ohio 105, 83 Ohio St. 3d 331

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 331.]

THE STATE EX REL. MCADOO, CROSS-APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, CROSS-APPELLEE.

[Cite as State ex rel. McAdoo v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-105.]

Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of Newman. (No. 96-1654—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided October 7, 1998.)

CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD05- 615.

__________________

Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jaffy and Marc J. Jaffy;

Deegan & McGarry and F. Timothy Deegan, for cross-appellant.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Michael A. Vanderhorst, Assistant Attorney General, for cross-appellee.

__________________

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on authority of State ex rel. Newman v. Indus. Comm. (1997), 77 Ohio St.3d 271, 673 N.E.2d 1301.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

__________________