State ex rel. Mayo v. Whitley

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Mayo v. Whitley

608 So. 2d 160, 1992 La. LEXIS 3505, 1992 WL 339161

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 13, 1992

DocketNo. 91-KH-2035

StatusPublished

This text of 608 So. 2d 160 (State ex rel. Mayo v. Whitley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Mayo v. Whitley, 608 So. 2d 160, 1992 La. LEXIS 3505, 1992 WL 339161 (La. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Mayo, Anthony; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 82797.

Granted in part; not considered in part. As to relator’s claim of ineffective assis[161]*161tance of counsel on appeal, the district court is ordered to grant relator an out-of-time appeal and to appoint counsel to handle the appeal on relator’s behalf. See, Lofton v. Whitley, 905 F.2d 885 (5th Cir.1990); State v. Robinson, 590 So.2d 1185 (La.1992). If appointed counsel, after reviewing the record, finds no basis for assigning error on appeal, he may follow the procedure outlined in State v. Benjamin, 573 So.2d 528 (La.App. 4th Cir.1990). As to relator’s other claims, they are prematurely before this Court and [are] not considered. La.C.Cr.P. art. 924.1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Mayo, Anthony; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 82797.

Granted in part; not considered in part. As to relator’s claim of ineffective assis[161]*161tance of counsel on appeal, the district court is ordered to grant relator an out-of-time appeal and to appoint counsel to handle the appeal on relator’s behalf. See, Lofton v. Whitley, 905 F.2d 885 (5th Cir.1990); State v. Robinson, 590 So.2d 1185 (La.1992). If appointed counsel, after reviewing the record, finds no basis for assigning error on appeal, he may follow the procedure outlined in State v. Benjamin, 573 So.2d 528 (La.App. 4th Cir.1990). As to relator’s other claims, they are prematurely before this Court and [are] not considered. La.C.Cr.P. art. 924.1.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

608 So. 2d 160, 1992 La. LEXIS 3505, 1992 WL 339161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-mayo-v-whitley-la-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack