State ex rel. Mayle v. Conrad
This text of 1998 Ohio 204 (State ex rel. Mayle v. Conrad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 508.]
THE STATE EX REL. MAYLE, APPELLANT, v. CONRAD, ADMR., ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Mayle v. Conrad, 1998-Ohio-204.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 96-1419—Submitted June 24, 1998—Decided August 5, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD09-1208. __________________ Law Offices of Ronald J., Koltak, Ronald J. Koltak and Peter J. Gibson, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jeffrey D. Snyder, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1998 Ohio 204, 82 Ohio St. 3d 508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-mayle-v-conrad-ohio-1998.