State ex rel. Maufas v. Coleman
772 S.W.2d 27, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 967, 1989 WL 72066
Opinion
ORDER
Employee appeals from an order dismissing his petition in mandamus. We affirm. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Maufas v. Coleman, 772 S.W.2d 27, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 967, 1989 WL 72066 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).
772 S.W.2d 27 (State ex rel. Maufas v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.