State ex rel. Mattox v. Layton

Supreme Court of Florida

State ex rel. Mattox v. Layton

210 So. 2d 199, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2237

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 24, 1968·No. No. 36734·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to writ of certiorari issued herein the decision of the District Court of Appeal, 1st District, has been reviewed and should be adopted on authority of the order of this Court in the companion case of State ex rel. Lowe v. Nelson, Fla.1968, 210 So.2d 197, and the opinion appearing at Fla.App., 202 So.2d 232.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW and THORNAL, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., concurs, but see my special concurring opinion filed in State ex rel. Lowe v. Nelson, Fla.1968, 210 So.2d 198. ROBERTS and ADAMS, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to writ of certiorari issued herein the decision of the District Court of Appeal, 1st District, has been reviewed and should be adopted on authority of the order of this Court in the companion case of State ex rel. Lowe v. Nelson, Fla.1968, 210 So.2d 197, and the opinion appearing at Fla.App., 202 So.2d 232.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW and THORNAL, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., concurs, but see my special concurring opinion filed in State ex rel. Lowe v. Nelson, Fla.1968, 210 So.2d 198. ROBERTS and ADAMS, JJ., dissent.

State ex rel. Mattox v. Layton, 210 So. 2d 199, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2237 (Fla. 1968).

Pincite

210 So. 2d 199 (State ex rel. Mattox v. Layton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related