State ex rel. Mattingly v. Municipal Court

325 N.W.2d 75, 109 Wis. 2d 53, 1982 Wisc. App. LEXIS 3944
CourtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin
DecidedSeptember 10, 1982
DocketNo. 81-2176
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 325 N.W.2d 75 (State ex rel. Mattingly v. Municipal Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Wisconsin primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Mattingly v. Municipal Court, 325 N.W.2d 75, 109 Wis. 2d 53, 1982 Wisc. App. LEXIS 3944 (Wis. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

DECKER, C.J.

The order of the circuit court directing the clerk of the Glendale municipal court to accept a “perfected jury demand of Richard F. Mattingly” is reversed because Mattingly’s demand for a jury trial was untimely and not in writing, and the jury demand was not accompanied by the payment of the jury fee.

A uniform traffic citation issued to Mattingly on June 21, 1981, required his appearance in Glendale municipal court on July 2, 1981. On June 30, 1981, the clerk of the court received a letter1 dated June 25, 1981, stating [55]*55Mattingly’s “wish to plead not guilty” to the charge and requesting a continuance from July 2 to July 30, 1981, at 8:30 a.m. The municipal court continued the case to July 30, 1981, when an attorney for Mattingly appeared and orally requested a jury trial. No written demand appears in the record. The municipal court refused the request as untimely and set a new court trial date for September 17, 1981. On the latter date the attorney for Mattingly delivered to the municipal court an alternative writ of prohibition issued by Judge Jennaro which suspended further proceedings in the municipal court and resulted in the order to accept a “perfected jury demand.”

Mattingly waived his right to a jury trial (sec. 345.43 (1) (a), Stats.) when:

(1) his jury trial demand was not made in writing; and

(2) the jury trial demand was not accompanied by the immediate payment of jury fees prescribed by sec. 345.43(1) (b).

By the Court. — Order reversed and cause remanded with directions to dismiss the circuit court proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Fond Du Lac v. Kaehne
599 N.W.2d 870 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
325 N.W.2d 75, 109 Wis. 2d 53, 1982 Wisc. App. LEXIS 3944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-mattingly-v-municipal-court-wisctapp-1982.