State ex rel. Matthews v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Matthews v. State

840 So. 2d 1210, 2003 La. LEXIS 950, 2003 WL 1884759

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 4, 2003

DocketNo. 2002-KH-0363

StatusPublished

This text of 840 So. 2d 1210 (State ex rel. Matthews v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Matthews v. State, 840 So. 2d 1210, 2003 La. LEXIS 950, 2003 WL 1884759 (La. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Matthews, Donald; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 3675-95; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 01-00672.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied; sentence amended. Relator’s sentence is amended to provide that he serve 20 years imprisonment at hard labor without benefit of parole eligibility for 15 years. The district court is directed to make an entry in the minutes reflecting this change. See State v. Tate, 99-1483 (La.11/24/99), 747 So.2d 519. In all other respects the application is denied.

KIMBALL, J., would deny the writ. [1211]*1211TRAYLOR, J., would deny the writ. WEIMER, J., would deny the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Matthews, Donald; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 3675-95; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 01-00672.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied; sentence amended. Relator’s sentence is amended to provide that he serve 20 years imprisonment at hard labor without benefit of parole eligibility for 15 years. The district court is directed to make an entry in the minutes reflecting this change. See State v. Tate, 99-1483 (La.11/24/99), 747 So.2d 519. In all other respects the application is denied.

KIMBALL, J., would deny the writ. [1211]*1211TRAYLOR, J., would deny the writ. WEIMER, J., would deny the writ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

840 So. 2d 1210, 2003 La. LEXIS 950, 2003 WL 1884759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-matthews-v-state-la-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack