State ex rel. Matthews v. Bazen

Ohio Court of Appeals

State ex rel. Matthews v. Bazen

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 746

Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided October 8, 1924·No. No. 633·Published

Opinion

WARDEN, J.

Epitomized Opinion

Published Only In Ohio Law Abstract

The sole question raised by the pleadings was the constitutionality of Ordinance 1507 of the City, of Marion regulating the location of public automiobile gasoline or oil fillling stations and sales depots. In holding the ordinance invalid, the Court of Appeals held:

1. The ordinance is invalid because of its alleged delegation of legislative power. (Cincinnati v. Cook, 107 OS. 223 cited and followed.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WARDEN, J.

Epitomized Opinion

Published Only In Ohio Law Abstract

The sole question raised by the pleadings was the constitutionality of Ordinance 1507 of the City, of Marion regulating the location of public automiobile gasoline or oil fillling stations and sales depots. In holding the ordinance invalid, the Court of Appeals held:

1. The ordinance is invalid because of its alleged delegation of legislative power. (Cincinnati v. Cook, 107 OS. 223 cited and followed.)

State ex rel. Matthews v. Bazen, 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 746 (Ohio Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 746 (State ex rel. Matthews v. Bazen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related