State ex rel. Masionett v. City Court

215 N.E.2d 863, 247 Ind. 348, 1966 Ind. LEXIS 359
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided April 26, 1966·No. No. 30,625·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Jackson, J.

Relator heretofore filed an original action in this court seeking a Writ of Mandate requiring the respondent Judge to grant a change of venue from the Judge.

Pursuant to the petition so filed this court did issue an alternative writ requiring the City Court of Gary, and Richard S. Kaplan Judge thereof, to expunge the entry in the City Court of Gary, cause No. 64-3169, entitled State of Indiana v. Mable (Winters) Masionett, denying the defendant therein and the relator herein, a change of venue from the Judge, Richard S. Kaplan, and to grant relator’s motion for a change of venue from the Judge and to name a panel of qualified persons from which to strike, or on failure so to do to file a return showing any reason in law or in fact why such writ should not be made permanent. Such writ was duly served on respondent.

It appears that immediately upon being served with the alternative Writ of Mandate the respondent Judge fully complied with the same although no return was filed thereto by respondent.

[349] This cause is therefore now dismissed as moot.

Myers, C. J., Rakestraw and Arterburn, JJ., concur. Achor, J., not participating.

Note. — Reported in 215 N. E. 2d 863.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Masionett v. City Court, 215 N.E.2d 863, 247 Ind. 348, 1966 Ind. LEXIS 359 (Ind. 1966).

215 N.E.2d 863 (State ex rel. Masionett v. City Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stayton v. Funkhouser
263 N.E.2d 764 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1970)
In Re James
215 N.E.2d 863 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1966)