State ex rel. Martin v. State

679 So. 2d 414, 1996 La. LEXIS 2368, 1996 WL 537036
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 20, 1996·No. No. 94-KH-1526·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In re Martin, Willie; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “H”, No. 304-441; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 93KA-0411.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied; case remanded to the district court. The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for relator for purposes of conducting an evidentiary hearing at which it will determine whether relator was wearing identifiable prison garb at trial, and if he was, whether his attorney’s failure to timely raise the issue at trial constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard set out in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). See State ex rel. Young v. Whitley, 92-3022 (La. 4/22/94), 637 So.2d 147; State v. Roche, 94-0300 (La. 6/28/96), 675 So.2d 1101.

MARCUS, KIMBALL and BLEICH, JJ., would deny the writ. LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Martin v. State, 679 So. 2d 414, 1996 La. LEXIS 2368, 1996 WL 537036 (La. 1996).

679 So. 2d 414 (State ex rel. Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. Cain
Fifth Circuit, 2001
State v. Winding
787 So. 2d 385 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2001)
State v. Wise
684 So. 2d 408 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1996)