State ex rel. Martin v. Holloway

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Martin v. Holloway

925 N.E.2d 998, 125 Ohio St. 3d 1409

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 5, 2010·No. 2010-0307·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Sua sponte, Robert Martin is found to be a vexatious litigator pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 14.5(B). Accordingly, Martin is prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. Any request for leave shall be filed with the Clerk of this court for the court’s review.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Sua sponte, Robert Martin is found to be a vexatious litigator pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 14.5(B). Accordingly, Martin is prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. Any request for leave shall be filed with the Clerk of this court for the court’s review.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., not participating.

State ex rel. Martin v. Holloway, 925 N.E.2d 998, 125 Ohio St. 3d 1409 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

925 N.E.2d 998 (State ex rel. Martin v. Holloway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.