State ex rel. Martin v. Holloway

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Martin v. Holloway

925 N.E.2d 998, 125 Ohio St. 3d 1409

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 5, 2010

Docket2010-0307

StatusPublished

This text of 925 N.E.2d 998 (State ex rel. Martin v. Holloway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Martin v. Holloway, 925 N.E.2d 998, 125 Ohio St. 3d 1409 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Sua sponte, Robert Martin is found to be a vexatious litigator pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 14.5(B). Accordingly, Martin is prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. Any request for leave shall be filed with the Clerk of this court for the court’s review.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Sua sponte, Robert Martin is found to be a vexatious litigator pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 14.5(B). Accordingly, Martin is prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. Any request for leave shall be filed with the Clerk of this court for the court’s review.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

925 N.E.2d 998, 125 Ohio St. 3d 1409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-martin-v-holloway-ohio-2010.