State ex rel. Martin v. Cline

738 N.E.2d 1253, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1479, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3019
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 6, 2000
Docket00-1772
StatusPublished

This text of 738 N.E.2d 1253 (State ex rel. Martin v. Cline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Martin v. Cline, 738 N.E.2d 1253, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1479, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3019 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On answer of respondent and motion for judgment on pleadings, motion to dismiss, motion for summary judgment, and motion for protective order. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
738 N.E.2d 1253, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1479, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-martin-v-cline-ohio-2000.