State ex rel. Martin v. Board of County Commissioners

80 Fla. 332
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 27, 1920
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 80 Fla. 332 (State ex rel. Martin v. Board of County Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Martin v. Board of County Commissioners, 80 Fla. 332 (Fla. 1920).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

An appeal was taken from an order dismissing an alternative writ of mandamus.

The statute provides that “all proceedings' to procure review by an appellate court of the proceedings of a lower court in cases at law shall be by writ of error, except in cases where certiorari or prohibition shall lie, or where it shall be otherwise expressly provided.” Sec. 1690 Gen. Stats. 1906, Compiled Laws, 1914. -

Mandamus is a proceeding at,,law, and there, is no express provision that a review thereof by an appellate court may be had except by writ of error, or perhaps in exceptional cases by certiorari.

The entry of an appeal is not authorized by law and does not give the appellate court jurisdiction of the subject matter in mandamus proceedings, though the oppos[333]*333ing parties have appeared; and' as it does not appear that a writ of error was duly issued in the cause, the appeal and the cause are dismissed.

Browne, O. J. and Taylor, Whitfield, Ellis and West, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Damguard v. Tunnicliffe
117 So. 898 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 Fla. 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-martin-v-board-of-county-commissioners-fla-1920.