State ex rel. Marshall v. Criminal District Court, Section "J"

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Marshall v. Criminal District Court, Section "J"

544 So. 2d 413, 1989 La. LEXIS 1471, 1989 WL 61156

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 5, 1989

DocketNo. 89-KH-1131

StatusPublished

This text of 544 So. 2d 413 (State ex rel. Marshall v. Criminal District Court, Section "J") is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Marshall v. Criminal District Court, Section "J", 544 So. 2d 413, 1989 La. LEXIS 1471, 1989 WL 61156 (La. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Marshall, Charles; — Plaintiffs); applying for writ of mandamus and supervisory and/or remedial writ.; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “J”, No. 282-382.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he has filed. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Marshall, Charles; — Plaintiffs); applying for writ of mandamus and supervisory and/or remedial writ.; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “J”, No. 282-382.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he has filed. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

544 So. 2d 413, 1989 La. LEXIS 1471, 1989 WL 61156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-marshall-v-criminal-district-court-section-j-la-1989.