State ex rel. Marsh v. Indus. Comm.
This text of 2000 Ohio 157 (State ex rel. Marsh v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 276.]
THE STATE EX REL. MARSH, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Marsh v. Indus. Comm., 2000-Ohio-157.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 99-2173—Submitted May 23, 2000—Decided July 12, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-1442. __________________ Becker, Reed, Tilton & Hastings and Dennis A. Becker, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Edward Roberts, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. PFEIFER, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2000 Ohio 157, 89 Ohio St. 3d 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-marsh-v-indus-comm-ohio-2000.