State ex rel. Manger v. Hawes

Supreme Court of Missouri

State ex rel. Manger v. Hawes

76 S.W. 1107, 177 Mo. 400, 1903 Mo. LEXIS 199

DecidedNovember 3, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 76 S.W. 1107 (State ex rel. Manger v. Hawes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Manger v. Hawes, 76 S.W. 1107, 177 Mo. 400, 1903 Mo. LEXIS 199 (Mo. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

GANTT, J.

Relator was appointed an emergency special on April 16, 1889, and within a short time thereafter (the exact date is not given) he was appointed a regular patrolman for a term of four years, which he [401]*401fully served, and now claims lie was reappointed, by implication, for another four-year- term in 1893, and was dropped on October 17, 1895. He asks a mandamus for $2,038.78 for the unexpired part of his term by implication. He was again appointed a probationary patrolman August 21,1899, and is still on the force. Judgment for the defendants, and relator appealed.

He has no case. [State ex rel. Rife v. Hawes, p. 360 of this volume.] The judgment of the circuit court is right and it is affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GANTT, J.

Relator was appointed an emergency special on April 16, 1889, and within a short time thereafter (the exact date is not given) he was appointed a regular patrolman for a term of four years, which he [401]*401fully served, and now claims lie was reappointed, by implication, for another four-year- term in 1893, and was dropped on October 17, 1895. He asks a mandamus for $2,038.78 for the unexpired part of his term by implication. He was again appointed a probationary patrolman August 21,1899, and is still on the force. Judgment for the defendants, and relator appealed.

He has no case. [State ex rel. Rife v. Hawes, p. 360 of this volume.] The judgment of the circuit court is right and it is affirmed.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 S.W. 1107, 177 Mo. 400, 1903 Mo. LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-manger-v-hawes-mo-1903.