State ex rel. Magnetek National Electric Coil v. Adair

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Magnetek National Electric Coil v. Adair

785 N.E.2d 749, 98 Ohio St. 3d 388

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 9, 2003

DocketNo. 2002-0431

StatusPublished

This text of 785 N.E.2d 749 (State ex rel. Magnetek National Electric Coil v. Adair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Magnetek National Electric Coil v. Adair, 785 N.E.2d 749, 98 Ohio St. 3d 388 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook, Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., concur. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, L.L.P., and Michael Soto, for appellants. Reinhard, Zamora & Bates, L.P.A., and Charles Zamora, for appellee James D. Adair. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Cheryl J. Nester, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook, Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., concur. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, L.L.P., and Michael Soto, for appellants. Reinhard, Zamora & Bates, L.P.A., and Charles Zamora, for appellee James D. Adair. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Cheryl J. Nester, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

785 N.E.2d 749, 98 Ohio St. 3d 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-magnetek-national-electric-coil-v-adair-ohio-2003.