State ex rel. Magner v. Longfellow

Missouri Court of Appeals

State ex rel. Magner v. Longfellow

69 S.W. 599, 95 Mo. App. 668, 1902 Mo. App. LEXIS 86

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 22, 1902

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 69 S.W. 599 (State ex rel. Magner v. Longfellow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Magner v. Longfellow, 69 S.W. 599, 95 Mo. App. 668, 1902 Mo. App. LEXIS 86 (Mo. Ct. App. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment awarding a peremptory writ of mandamus. Relator -was an inspector of buildings in the department of the commissioner of public buildings in the city of St. Louis, and the facts of his case are identical with those described in the opinion of the court in State ex rel. Bartraw v. Longfellow, 95 Mo. App. (St. L.) 660. Relator in this action was appoint [670]*670ed and was removed on the same dates and in the same manner as was Mr. Bartraw, the relator in the other action.

Following that decision and the earlier one of State ex rel. Knittel v. Longfellow, 93 Mo. App. (St. L.) 364, (67 S. W. 665), the judgment in the case at bar is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to enter judgment denying the peremptory writ, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment awarding a peremptory writ of mandamus. Relator -was an inspector of buildings in the department of the commissioner of public buildings in the city of St. Louis, and the facts of his case are identical with those described in the opinion of the court in State ex rel. Bartraw v. Longfellow, 95 Mo. App. (St. L.) 660. Relator in this action was appoint [670]*670ed and was removed on the same dates and in the same manner as was Mr. Bartraw, the relator in the other action.

Following that decision and the earlier one of State ex rel. Knittel v. Longfellow, 93 Mo. App. (St. L.) 364, (67 S. W. 665), the judgment in the case at bar is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to enter judgment denying the peremptory writ, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 S.W. 599, 95 Mo. App. 668, 1902 Mo. App. LEXIS 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-magner-v-longfellow-moctapp-1902.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack