State ex rel. Magee v. State
This text of 692 So. 2d 408 (State ex rel. Magee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Magee, Ruchell Cinque; — Plaintiffis); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 10-755.
Relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to vacate judgment he filed on or about December 4, 1996. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court. The district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
692 So. 2d 408, 1997 La. LEXIS 1033, 1997 WL 160413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-magee-v-state-la-1997.