State ex rel. Madison v. Connors
880 N.E.2d 924, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1516
This text of 880 N.E.2d 924 (State ex rel. Madison v. Connors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State ex rel. Madison v. Connors, 880 N.E.2d 924, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1516 (Ohio 2008).
Opinion
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. On February 6, 2008, the respondent filed a motion for summary judgment. S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) states that neither party may file a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, respondent’s motion for summary judgment is stricken as prohibited by the Rules of Practice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
880 N.E.2d 924, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-madison-v-connors-ohio-2008.