State ex rel. Madison v. Connors

880 N.E.2d 924, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1516
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 12, 2008·No. 2008-0112·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. On February 6, 2008, the respondent filed a motion for summary judgment. S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) states that neither party may file a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, respondent’s motion for summary judgment is stricken as prohibited by the Rules of Practice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Madison v. Connors, 880 N.E.2d 924, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1516 (Ohio 2008).

880 N.E.2d 924 (State ex rel. Madison v. Connors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.