State ex rel. Madigan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Madigan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections

894 N.E.2d 699, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1480

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 9, 2008

Docket2008-1938

StatusPublished

This text of 894 N.E.2d 699 (State ex rel. Madigan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Madigan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections, 894 N.E.2d 699, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1480 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus/prohibition involving an expedited election matter. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the briefing in this case shall proceed as follows: The parties shall file their briefs and evidence within five days of the filing of the response. The Clerk shall refuse to file any reply briefs or requests for extension of time.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus/prohibition involving an expedited election matter. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the briefing in this case shall proceed as follows: The parties shall file their briefs and evidence within five days of the filing of the response. The Clerk shall refuse to file any reply briefs or requests for extension of time.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

894 N.E.2d 699, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-madigan-v-cuyahoga-cty-bd-of-elections-ohio-2008.