State ex rel. Maddox v. Lincoln Hts.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Maddox v. Lincoln Hts.

25 N.E.3d 1078, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1470

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 18, 2015

Docket2014-1267

StatusPublished

This text of 25 N.E.3d 1078 (State ex rel. Maddox v. Lincoln Hts.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Maddox v. Lincoln Hts., 25 N.E.3d 1078, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1470 (Ohio 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. It is ordered by the court that an alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. 12.05:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within 10 days of the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondent’s brief. On respondents’ motion to dismiss and motion to dismiss first amended complaint. Motions denied. On relators’ motion for leave to file second amended complaint. Motion granted.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. It is ordered by the court that an alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. 12.05:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within 10 days of the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondent’s brief. On respondents’ motion to dismiss and motion to dismiss first amended complaint. Motions denied. On relators’ motion for leave to file second amended complaint. Motion granted.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 N.E.3d 1078, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-maddox-v-lincoln-hts-ohio-2015.