State Ex Rel. Lyon v. German Rifle Club

61 S.E. 208, 80 S.C. 126, 1908 S.C. LEXIS 137
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided April 21, 1908·No. 6886·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

¡The facts in the case are similar to those set out in the opinion just filed, in the case of the State of South 'Carolina ex relatione J. Fraser Lyon, as- attorney-general, against the New Charleston Hotel Co. et al., as to the names of the respondents, dates and places where the nuisance is maintained.

It is, therefore, unnecessary to reiterate the reasons why the prayer of the -petition should be granted.

It is the judgment of -this Court, that the respondents be perpetually enjoined from- tnlainfaining, using and keeping *127 said place, where persons are permitted to resort, for the purpose of drinking alcoholic liquors and beverages, and from permitting persons to resort to the said premises for the purpose of drinking alcoholic liquors and beverages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Lyon v. German Rifle Club, 61 S.E. 208, 80 S.C. 126, 1908 S.C. LEXIS 137 (S.C. 1908).

61 S.E. 208 (State Ex Rel. Lyon v. German Rifle Club) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Booze v. Neal
64 S.E. 1104 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)