State Ex Rel. Lyon v. Carroll

Supreme Court of South Carolina

State Ex Rel. Lyon v. Carroll

61 S.E. 209, 80 S.C. 117, 1908 S.C. LEXIS 141

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedApril 21, 1908

Docket6882

StatusPublished

This text of 61 S.E. 209 (State Ex Rel. Lyon v. Carroll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Lyon v. Carroll, 61 S.E. 209, 80 S.C. 117, 1908 S.C. LEXIS 141 (S.C. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

The facts in this case are similar to those set out in the opinion just filed, in the case of the State of South Carolina, ex relatione, J. Fraser Lyon, as Attorney General, against The New Charleston Hotel Company et al., *118 except as to the names of the respondents, dates and place where the nuisance is maintained.

It is, therefore, unnecessary to reiterate the reasons why the prayer of the petitioner should be granted.

It is the judgment of this Court that the respondents be perpetually enjoined from maintaining, using and keeping said place, where persons are permitted to resort for the purpose of drinking alcoholic liquors and beverages, and from permitting persons to resort to the said premises for the purpose of drinking alcoholic liquors and beverages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

The facts in this case are similar to those set out in the opinion just filed, in the case of the State of South Carolina, ex relatione, J. Fraser Lyon, as Attorney General, against The New Charleston Hotel Company et al., *118 except as to the names of the respondents, dates and place where the nuisance is maintained.

It is, therefore, unnecessary to reiterate the reasons why the prayer of the petitioner should be granted.

It is the judgment of this Court that the respondents be perpetually enjoined from maintaining, using and keeping said place, where persons are permitted to resort for the purpose of drinking alcoholic liquors and beverages, and from permitting persons to resort to the said premises for the purpose of drinking alcoholic liquors and beverages.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 S.E. 209, 80 S.C. 117, 1908 S.C. LEXIS 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-lyon-v-carroll-sc-1908.