State Ex Rel. Lyon v. Brady

73 S.E. 184, 90 S.C. 330, 1912 S.C. LEXIS 60
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State Ex Rel. Lyon v. Brady. Read the opinion of the Court — 90 S.C. 288
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided January 8, 1912·No. 8085·Published

Opinion

The following order was filed):

Per Curiam.

Returns to the rule to 'show cause 'herein issued having 'been made by the respondieotsi, Charles J. Lynch, J. W. Rice, A. N. Elirodl, F. W. Airmbrusber and T. A. Heise, and said return being sufficient in that they show a complete abatement and' discontinuance in good1 faith of the alleged nuisance within the jurisdiction of this Court, and the declaration that the respondents do not contemplate doing any of the -acts alleged in the petition herein a© a nuisance, within the jurisdiction of this Court,

It is ordered, that the petition and rule to show cause herein be dismissed.

That the respondents herein do pay the costs- of this pro ceeding, and' that the same be taxed and adjusted by the clerk and submitted to -the Court for approval.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Lyon v. Brady, 73 S.E. 184, 90 S.C. 330, 1912 S.C. LEXIS 60 (S.C. 1912).

73 S.E. 184 (State Ex Rel. Lyon v. Brady) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.