State Ex Rel. Lynne v. Gurley

117 So. 297, 217 Ala. 666, 1928 Ala. LEXIS 104
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 7, 1928
Docket8 Div. 10.
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 117 So. 297 (State Ex Rel. Lynne v. Gurley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Lynne v. Gurley, 117 So. 297, 217 Ala. 666, 1928 Ala. LEXIS 104 (Ala. 1928).

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

The appellant gave written notice of the appeal, but it was not served upon appellees, or the record fails to disclose *667 such notice if duly given. Sherrod v. McGruder, 209 Ala. 260, 96 So. 78; section 6140 et seq., Code, Gen. Acts 1911, p. 589.

A due notice of appeal is necessary to bring in the party -in adverse interest not joining in or taking an appeal, and, failing in this, and there being no voluntary appearance in the appellate court of such adverse party or parties (L. & N. R. Co. v. Shikle, 206 Ala. 494, 90 So. 900), the failure is that of jurisdiction in this court to proceed to judgment against such parties not brought in or not appearing (Chandler v. Home Loan Co., 211 Ala. 80, 99 So. 723; New Morgan County B. & L. Ass’n v. Plemmons, 210 Ala. 16, 97 So. 46; Smith v. Collier, 210 Ala. 23, 97 So. 101).

Such a defect is taken by this court ex mero motu. For the failure of the record to show such due notice or appearance here, the appeal is dismissed; all the parties in interest are not before this court. Sherrod v. McGruder, supra; L. & N. R. Co. v. Shikle, 206 Ala. 494, 497, 90 So. 900. Citation or notice of appearance here is necessary as no appeal can be duly maintained to final judgment-here without appellee. Griffin v. Milligan, 177 Ala. 57, 58 So. 257; Williams v. Harper, 95 Ala. 610, 10 So. 327; Miller v. Parker, 47 Ala. 312.

Dismissed by the court ex mero mótu. .

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tolbert v. Ervin
264 So. 3d 879 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2018)
Premier Health Management, Inc. v. Sherling
100 So. 3d 561 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2012)
Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. Roberts
257 So. 2d 333 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1972)
Lovelady v. Thomas
139 So. 2d 335 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1962)
Thompson v. State ex rel. Borders
107 So. 2d 890 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)
Bowlin v. Bowlin
104 So. 2d 630 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)
Brock v. Stimpson
43 So. 2d 133 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1949)
Riddle v. Adams
165 So. 848 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1936)
Granade v. Stanford Bros.
162 So. 408 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1935)
McLeod v. Turner
162 So. 309 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1935)
Beatty v. McMillan
147 So. 180 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 So. 297, 217 Ala. 666, 1928 Ala. LEXIS 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-lynne-v-gurley-ala-1928.