State Ex Rel. Lynch v. Toledo Area Regional Transit Authority

2009 Ohio 2609, 908 N.E.2d 423, 122 Ohio St. 3d 81
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 10, 2009
Docket2008-1484
StatusPublished

This text of 2009 Ohio 2609 (State Ex Rel. Lynch v. Toledo Area Regional Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Lynch v. Toledo Area Regional Transit Authority, 2009 Ohio 2609, 908 N.E.2d 423, 122 Ohio St. 3d 81 (Ohio 2009).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. Lanzinger, J., not participating. *82 Gallon, Takacs, Boissoneault & Schaffer Co., L.P.A., and Theodore A. Bowman, for appellant. Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Douglas R. Unver, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2009 Ohio 2609, 908 N.E.2d 423, 122 Ohio St. 3d 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-lynch-v-toledo-area-regional-transit-authority-ohio-2009.