State ex rel. Lutz v. McMonagle

97 Ohio St. 3d 1424
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 18, 2002
Docket2002-1726
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 97 Ohio St. 3d 1424 (State ex rel. Lutz v. McMonagle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Lutz v. McMonagle, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1424 (Ohio 2002).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The Law Offices of Squire v. Fahey Bank, 08ap-647 (2-10-2009)
2009 Ohio 577 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2009)
State v. Jackson, Unpublished Decision (12-2-2004)
2004 Ohio 6438 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)
State v. Myers
780 N.E.2d 601 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)
Pearn v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
780 N.E.2d 601 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)
Estep v. Rieter Automotive N. Am., Inc.
780 N.E.2d 601 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)
Hager v. Waste Technologies Industries
780 N.E.2d 601 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 Ohio St. 3d 1424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-lutz-v-mcmonagle-ohio-2002.