State ex rel. Lutz v. McMonagle

97 Ohio St. 3d 1424
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 18, 2002·No. 2002-1726·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Lutz v. McMonagle, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1424 (Ohio 2002).

97 Ohio St. 3d 1424 (State ex rel. Lutz v. McMonagle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The Law Offices of Squire v. Fahey Bank, 08ap-647 (2-10-2009)
2009 Ohio 577 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2009)
State v. Jackson, Unpublished Decision (12-2-2004)
2004 Ohio 6438 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)
State v. Myers
780 N.E.2d 601 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)
Pearn v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
780 N.E.2d 601 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)
Estep v. Rieter Automotive N. Am., Inc.
780 N.E.2d 601 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)
Hager v. Waste Technologies Industries
780 N.E.2d 601 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)