State ex rel. Luster v. Lake Criminal Court

166 N.E.2d 335, 240 Ind. 705, 1960 Ind. LEXIS 254
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided April 27, 1960·No. No. 0-594·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam

This is an original action for an alternative writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to accept jurisdiction, [706]*706hear and determine petitioner’s petition for a writ of error coram nobis, or show cause why the same should not be done.

Petitioner did not file his petition in quintuplícate, and it does not contain certified copies of all pleadings, orders and entries pertaining to the subject matter. The petitioner does not allege that a copy of his petition for a writ of error coram nobis was ever filed with the Attorney General of Indiana and the Prosecuting Attorney of Lake County, Indiana. See: State ex rel. Powers v. Vigo C. C., Criss, J. et al. (1957), 236 Ind. 408, 413, 140 N. E. 2d 497; State ex rel. Sanders v. Reeves (1950), 228 Ind. 293, 295, 91 N. E. 2d 912.

Petitioner has failed to comply with Rule 2-35 and the petition should be dismissed.

Petition dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 166 N. E. 2d 335.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Luster v. Lake Criminal Court, 166 N.E.2d 335, 240 Ind. 705, 1960 Ind. LEXIS 254 (Ind. 1960).

166 N.E.2d 335 (State ex rel. Luster v. Lake Criminal Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wisemiller v. State
166 N.E.2d 335 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1960)