State ex rel. Luse v. Luse
This text of 53 N.E. 459 (State ex rel. Luse v. Luse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only reason urged for a reversal of this cause by appellant is that the finding of the court was contrary to the evidence. The correctness of this contention cannot be determined if the evidence is not in the record. The bill of exceptions does not contain the evidence, but refers to the same as “filed herewith.” It is settled that under such conditions, the evidence is not in the record. Elliott’s App. Proc., sections 821, 822; City of Alexandria v. Cutler, 139 Ind. 568, and cases cited; Garrett v. State, 149 Ind. 264, 265.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 N.E. 459, 152 Ind. 701, 1899 Ind. LEXIS 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-luse-v-luse-ind-1899.