State ex rel. Luse v. Luse

53 N.E. 459, 152 Ind. 701, 1899 Ind. LEXIS 200
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided April 19, 1899·No. No. 18,567·Published

Opinion

Monks, C. J.

The only reason urged for a reversal of this cause by appellant is that the finding of the court was contrary to the evidence. The correctness of this contention cannot be determined if the evidence is not in the record. The bill of exceptions does not contain the evidence, but refers to the same as “filed herewith.” It is settled that under such conditions, the evidence is not in the record. Elliott’s App. Proc., sections 821, 822; City of Alexandria v. Cutler, 139 Ind. 568, and cases cited; Garrett v. State, 149 Ind. 264, 265.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Luse v. Luse, 53 N.E. 459, 152 Ind. 701, 1899 Ind. LEXIS 200 (Ind. 1899).

53 N.E. 459 (State ex rel. Luse v. Luse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Alexandria v. Cutler
39 N.E. 237 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1894)
Garrett v. State ex rel. Huntsinger
49 N.E. 33 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1898)