State Ex Rel. Lurty v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

State Ex Rel. Lurty v. Industrial Commission

244 N.E.2d 773, 17 Ohio App. 2d 156, 46 Ohio Op. 2d 214, 1968 Ohio App. LEXIS 302

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 17, 1968

Docket9073

StatusPublished

This text of 244 N.E.2d 773 (State Ex Rel. Lurty v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Lurty v. Industrial Commission, 244 N.E.2d 773, 17 Ohio App. 2d 156, 46 Ohio Op. 2d 214, 1968 Ohio App. LEXIS 302 (Ohio Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Relator seeks an award for an impairment in earning capacity under the provisions of Section 4123.57 (A), Revised Code. Relator had a claim allowed for a dermatitis of the hands. He was employed as a “wet” grinder at the time, and since has been a “dry” grinder. The pay for the latter job is 31 cents per hour less than that received by the “wet” grinder.

*157 The relator does not allege any present condition of dermatitis, but seeks compensation for the wage impairment. Since extent of disability is not at issne, the case is governed by the recent case of State, ex rel. Foley, v. Greyhound Lines, 16 Ohio St. 2d 6. Appeal rather than mandamus would be the proper remedy.

Writ denied.

Teoop, J. (Presiding), Dueey and Heebebt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI