State Ex Rel. Lurty v. Industrial Commission

244 N.E.2d 773, 17 Ohio App. 2d 156, 46 Ohio Op. 2d 214, 1968 Ohio App. LEXIS 302
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided December 17, 1968·No. 9073·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Relator seeks an award for an impairment in earning capacity under the provisions of Section 4123.57 (A), Revised Code. Relator had a claim allowed for a dermatitis of the hands. He was employed as a “wet” grinder at the time, and since has been a “dry” grinder. The pay for the latter job is 31 cents per hour less than that received by the “wet” grinder.

*157 The relator does not allege any present condition of dermatitis, but seeks compensation for the wage impairment. Since extent of disability is not at issne, the case is governed by the recent case of State, ex rel. Foley, v. Greyhound Lines, 16 Ohio St. 2d 6. Appeal rather than mandamus would be the proper remedy.

Writ denied.

Teoop, J. (Presiding), Dueey and Heebebt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Lurty v. Industrial Commission, 244 N.E.2d 773, 17 Ohio App. 2d 156, 46 Ohio Op. 2d 214, 1968 Ohio App. LEXIS 302 (Ohio Ct. App. 1968).

244 N.E.2d 773 (State Ex Rel. Lurty v. Industrial Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Foley v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
241 N.E.2d 904 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1968)