State Ex Rel. Lukin v. District Court

Montana Supreme Court

State Ex Rel. Lukin v. District Court

139 P.2d 488, 113 Mont. 621, 1942 Mont. LEXIS 56

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 17, 1942

DocketNo. 8,391.

StatusPublished

This text of 139 P.2d 488 (State Ex Rel. Lukin v. District Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Lukin v. District Court, 139 P.2d 488, 113 Mont. 621, 1942 Mont. LEXIS 56 (Mo. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The writ prayed for is denied for the rea *622 son that under the provision of section 9751, Revised Codes, the relators, on appeal from the final judgment in the quiet title suit, without making the deposit required by order of the trial court under section 2214, may specify said order as error and this court must consider and determine the same, and that therefore the relators have an adequate remedy by appeal.

Mr. S. J. Rigney, for Relators.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The writ prayed for is denied for the rea *622 son that under the provision of section 9751, Revised Codes, the relators, on appeal from the final judgment in the quiet title suit, without making the deposit required by order of the trial court under section 2214, may specify said order as error and this court must consider and determine the same, and that therefore the relators have an adequate remedy by appeal.

Mr. S. J. Rigney, for Relators.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 P.2d 488, 113 Mont. 621, 1942 Mont. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-lukin-v-district-court-mont-1942.