Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State ex rel. Ludt v. Sciortino

State ex rel. Ludt v. Sciortino

853 N.E.2d 670, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1475
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 5, 2006·No. 2006-1557·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. [1476] Upon consideration of relators’ motion for an expedited alternative writ and expedited briefing schedule,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.

O’Donnell, J., dissents and would grant an alternative writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Ludt v. Sciortino, 853 N.E.2d 670, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1475 (Ohio 2006).

853 N.E.2d 670 (State ex rel. Ludt v. Sciortino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.