State ex rel. Ludt v. Sciortino
853 N.E.2d 670, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1475
This text of 853 N.E.2d 670 (State ex rel. Ludt v. Sciortino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State ex rel. Ludt v. Sciortino, 853 N.E.2d 670, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1475 (Ohio 2006).
Opinion
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. [1476]*1476Upon consideration of relators’ motion for an expedited alternative writ and expedited briefing schedule,
It is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
853 N.E.2d 670, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-ludt-v-sciortino-ohio-2006.