State ex rel. Lucas Cty. Republican Party Executive Commt. v. Husted

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Lucas Cty. Republican Party Executive Commt. v. Husted

21 N.E.3d 325, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1401

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 4, 2014

Docket2014-1123

StatusPublished

This text of 21 N.E.3d 325 (State ex rel. Lucas Cty. Republican Party Executive Commt. v. Husted) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Lucas Cty. Republican Party Executive Commt. v. Husted, 21 N.E.3d 325, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1401 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus.

Upon consideration of relator’s motion to redact personally identifying information, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Relator shall come to the Supreme Court of Ohio clerk’s office and redact all personal identifiers, as defined by Sup.R. 44(H) and S.Ct.Prae.R. 3.12, from the evidence within 14 days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus.

Upon consideration of relator’s motion to redact personally identifying information, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Relator shall come to the Supreme Court of Ohio clerk’s office and redact all personal identifiers, as defined by Sup.R. 44(H) and S.Ct.Prae.R. 3.12, from the evidence within 14 days of the date of this entry.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 N.E.3d 325, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-lucas-cty-republican-party-executive-commt-v-husted-ohio-2014.