State ex rel. Loyden v. State

138 So. 3d 1235, 2014 WL 1876503, 2014 La. LEXIS 1107
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 2, 2014·No. No. 2013-KH-1970·Published

Opinion

In re Loyden, Booker Earl; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 256385; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 13-00664.

Writ granted in part. The court of appeal is ordered to allow relator a reasonable amount of time to supplement his application with the appropriate supporting documentation and to (re)consider his pro se filing on the merits. See State v. Melon, 95-2209 (La 9/22/95), 660 So.2d 466 (“[Meaningful access to courts guaranteed by La. Const, art. I, §§ 2, 19 and 22 requires courts to accept and consider post-verdict pro se filings from represented defendants.”). In all other respects, the application is denied.

CLARK, J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Loyden v. State, 138 So. 3d 1235, 2014 WL 1876503, 2014 La. LEXIS 1107 (La. 2014).

138 So. 3d 1235 (State ex rel. Loyden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Melon
660 So. 2d 466 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1995)