State ex rel. Love v. Indus. Comm.

1999 Ohio 378, 85 Ohio St. 3d 341
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 21, 1999·No. 1998-1382·Published

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 85 Ohio St.3d 341.]

THE STATE EX REL. LOVE, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Love v. Indus. Comm., 1999-Ohio-378.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 98-1382—Submitted February 23, 1999—Decided April 21, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD05-691. __________________ Law Office of Thomas Tootle and Thomas Tootle, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jon D. Grandon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Love v. Indus. Comm., 1999 Ohio 378, 85 Ohio St. 3d 341 (Ohio 1999).

1999 Ohio 378 (State ex rel. Love v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.