State ex rel. Lorain v. Stewart

884 N.E.2d 1107, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1474
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 23, 2008·No. 2007-2289·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motions for leave to intervene and answers of Oster Construction, Inc., Bevat Investments, L.L.C., K. Hovnanian Oster Homes, L.L.C., and Affected Property Owners and respondent’s motion to dismiss. Motions to intervene are denied. Motion to dismiss is denied.

Sua sponte, an alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relators shall file a brief within ten days of the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relators’ brief; and relators may file a reply brief within seven days after filing of respondent’s brief.

Moyer, C.J., would grant the motions to intervene. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents and would grant the motion to dismiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Lorain v. Stewart, 884 N.E.2d 1107, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1474 (Ohio 2008).

884 N.E.2d 1107 (State ex rel. Lorain v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. City of Lorain v. Stewart
119 Ohio St. 3d 222 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)