State ex rel. Looney v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Looney v. State

162 So. 3d 376, 2015 La. LEXIS 890, 2015 WL 1608030

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 27, 2015

DocketNo. 2014-KH-1138

StatusPublished

This text of 162 So. 3d 376 (State ex rel. Looney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Looney v. State, 162 So. 3d 376, 2015 La. LEXIS 890, 2015 WL 1608030 (La. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Looney, Leo Franklin; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 48,543; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 49335-KH.

Denied. The decision in Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012) does not apply retroactively in relator’s case. See State v. Tate, 12-2763 (La.11/5/13), 130 So.3d 829, cert. denied, Tate v. Louisiana, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 2663, 189 L.Ed.2d 214 (2014).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Looney, Leo Franklin; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 48,543; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 49335-KH.

Denied. The decision in Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012) does not apply retroactively in relator’s case. See State v. Tate, 12-2763 (La.11/5/13), 130 So.3d 829, cert. denied, Tate v. Louisiana, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 2663, 189 L.Ed.2d 214 (2014).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 So. 3d 376, 2015 La. LEXIS 890, 2015 WL 1608030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-looney-v-state-la-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack