Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State ex rel. Longlott v. Industrial Commission

State ex rel. Longlott v. Industrial Commission

744 N.E.2d 188, 91 Ohio St. 3d 247, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 903
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 4, 2001
DocketNo. 00-1561
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 744 N.E.2d 188 (State ex rel. Longlott v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Longlott v. Industrial Commission, 744 N.E.2d 188, 91 Ohio St. 3d 247, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 903 (Ohio 2001).

Opinion

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Law Office of Thomas Tootle Co., L.P.A., and Thomas Tootle, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Thomas L. Reitz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Longlott v. Indus. Comm.
2001 Ohio 30 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
744 N.E.2d 188, 91 Ohio St. 3d 247, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-longlott-v-industrial-commission-ohio-2001.