State ex rel. Long v. Petree Stockton, L.L.P.
510 S.E.2d 374, 350 N.C. 57, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 9
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 5, 1999
DocketNo. 246PA98
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 510 S.E.2d 374 (State ex rel. Long v. Petree Stockton, L.L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State ex rel. Long v. Petree Stockton, L.L.P., 510 S.E.2d 374, 350 N.C. 57, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 9 (N.C. 1999).
Opinion
This Court allowed plaintiff’s petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals only as to the issue of constructive fraud.
WRIT OF CERTIORARI IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Carle v. Wyrick, Robbins, Yates & Ponton, LLP
738 S.E.2d 766 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
Sterner v. Penn
583 S.E.2d 670 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2003)
Walker v. Sloan
529 S.E.2d 236 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)
State Ex Rel. Long v. Ila Corp.
513 S.E.2d 812 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
510 S.E.2d 374, 350 N.C. 57, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-long-v-petree-stockton-llp-nc-1999.