State Ex Rel. Logue v. Fregiato, Unpublished Decision (6-7-2005)
This text of 2005 Ohio 2941 (State Ex Rel. Logue v. Fregiato, Unpublished Decision (6-7-2005)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 2} It may be gleaned from Relator's argument in support of his application for an extraordinary writ that his sole source of income is SSI benefits, which are arguably prohibited by federal law from being used to pay the outstanding fines and costs.
{¶ 3} Relator also contends that the trial court lost jurisdiction to pursue the outstanding fine and costs by its failure to act within five (5) years after the conviction was obtained, citing to R.C.
{¶ 4} On May 23, 2005, the Respondent filed a response seeking dismissal of the Petition. Attached to the filing is a copy of a May 18, 2005 entry from Respondent wherein the contempt motion was withdrawn, with a further statement that the state will file a civil matter. Such action by the Respondent moots this action, as the relief prayed for has been presently granted. See State ex rel. Fant v. Staples (1987),
{¶ 5} Accordingly, this Petition for Writ of Prohibition and Mandamus is dismissed as moot. No costs assessed.
{¶ 6} Final order. Clerk to serve notice as provided by the civil rules.
Donofrio, P.J., concurs.
Vukovich, J., concurs.
DeGenaro, J., concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2005 Ohio 2941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-logue-v-fregiato-unpublished-decision-6-7-2005-ohioctapp-2005.