State ex rel. Locascio v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Locascio v. Henderson

263 So. 2d 45, 262 La. 305, 1972 La. LEXIS 5018

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 20, 1972

DocketNo. 52565

StatusPublished

This text of 263 So. 2d 45 (State ex rel. Locascio v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Locascio v. Henderson, 263 So. 2d 45, 262 La. 305, 1972 La. LEXIS 5018 (La. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted. Neither the release of the prisoner on the Governor’s “communitative probation” nor his return by executive order are provided for in law. See R.S. ' 15:572 et seq. as amended by Acts 1968 No. 186. The record does not reflect that the trial judge had knowledge of “parole violation” in order to determine if new sentences should be concurrent or consecutive.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted. Neither the release of the prisoner on the Governor’s “communitative probation” nor his return by executive order are provided for in law. See R.S. ' 15:572 et seq. as amended by Acts 1968 No. 186. The record does not reflect that the trial judge had knowledge of “parole violation” in order to determine if new sentences should be concurrent or consecutive.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 So. 2d 45, 262 La. 305, 1972 La. LEXIS 5018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-locascio-v-henderson-la-1972.