State ex rel. Lipperd v. Carrington

Indiana Supreme Court

State ex rel. Lipperd v. Carrington

19 Ind. 258

DecidedNovember 15, 1862

StatusPublished

This text of 19 Ind. 258 (State ex rel. Lipperd v. Carrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Lipperd v. Carrington, 19 Ind. 258 (Ind. 1862).

Pincite

Opinion

Perkins, J.

Suit for review. Judgment for defendants. The error alleged to appear of record, is the reference of a cause, by agreement of parties, to a commissioner, to take accounts, without an answer having been filed to the complaint.

We think consent cured the error. The error alleged to exist in the report of the commissioner, if, indeed, it did exist, was left uneorrected, by the inexcusable negligence of the party concerned.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perkins, J.

Suit for review. Judgment for defendants. The error alleged to appear of record, is the reference of a cause, by agreement of parties, to a commissioner, to take accounts, without an answer having been filed to the complaint.

We think consent cured the error. The error alleged to exist in the report of the commissioner, if, indeed, it did exist, was left uneorrected, by the inexcusable negligence of the party concerned.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 Ind. 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-lipperd-v-carrington-ind-1862.